Edwards v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 561 So. 2d 260 - Skinner v. Skinner · 493 So. 2d 1126 - Stoner v. Verkaden · 485 So. 2d 891 - Mitchem v. Grubbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court has discretion to sanction a party who refuses to comply with a discovery order, but that discretion is limited by the provisions of rule 1.380(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Reduction of child support is not one of the authorized sanctions enumerated under rule 1.380(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If a party seeks an improper remedy, the cause shall be treated as if the proper remedy had been sought; provided that it shall not be the responsibility of the court to seek the proper remedy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. McKinnon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.