Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

634 So. 2d 291

State v. Roman

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-03-31

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1996

3 state decisions

Relies on 561 So. 2d 554 - Pope v. State · Ree v. State · State v. Nickerson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-03-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1When Mike Roman was originally sentenced, written reasons were stated for departure from the sentencing guidelines, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll). The State agreed to downward departure, and Roman was placed on community control. He subsequently violated the terms and conditions of community control. However, as in State v. Nickerson, 541 So.2d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), when imposing sentence after revoking community control, the court below did not provide a contemporaneous, written reason for a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. We, therefore, REVERSE Roman’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing within the guidelines. See Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990); Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990).

BARFIELD, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.
/634/so2d/291 · .json · Public domain