Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

634 So. 2d 319

State v. Dunsford

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-04-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1995

2 state decisions

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · United States v. Dixon · Grady v. Corbin

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-04-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We reverse the order dismissing the information. Under Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), there was no double jeopardy violation.1

¶2REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings.

ERVIN, MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

¶3. We acknowledge that United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 2849, 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993), which changed the law in this area, had not been issued at the time the trial court decided the case at bar and relied on the Court’s earlier contradictory decision in Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 110 S.Ct. 2084, 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990).

/634/so2d/319 · .json · Public domain