Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

634 So. 2d 679

Munch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-03-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1997

1 state decisions

Relies on Arnette v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The defendant’s conviction for armed robbery is affirmed. However, as the state concedes, the trial court erred in failing to award the defendant credit for time served in jail prior to sentencing. See § 921.161, Fla. Stat. The defendant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for computation of jail time credit. See Arnette v. State, 593 So.2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

¶2*680CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; AND CAUSE REMANDED.

COBB, PETERSON and DIAMANTES, JJ., concur.
/634/so2d/679 · .json · Public domain