Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1995
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 576 So. 2d 281 - State v. Williams · 561 So. 2d 554 - Pope v. State · Ree v. State · 598 So. 2d 1063 - Smith v. State · 576 So. 2d 706 - State v. Lyles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IN VIEW OF SMITH v. STATE, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 1992), DOES THE DECISION IN REE v. STATE, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 1990), REQUIRE REVERSAL AND REMAND FOR IMPOSITION OF A GUIDELINES SENTENCE IN A CASE THAT WAS PENDING ON DIRECT APPEAL WHEN REE WAS DECIDED, WAS FINALLY DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH REE , AND IN WHICH THE ISSUE WAS RAISED AGAIN BY MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF AFTER ISSUANCE OF SMITH ?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.