Haye v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2017
3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cox v. State of Louisiana · Dillon v. State · All States Freight, Inc. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad · Hemphill v. State · Sherman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) If conduct that would otherwise violate ... Section 42.03 of this code consists of speech or other communication, ... or of gathering with others to picket or otherwise express in a nonviolent manner a position on social, economic, political or religious questions, the actor must be ordered to move, disperse, or otherwise remedy the violation prior to his arrest if he has not yet intentionally harmed the interests of others which those sections seek to protect. (b) The order required by this section may be given by a peace officer, a fireman, a person with authority to control the use of the premises, or any person directly affected by the violation. (c) It is a defense to prosecution under Section 42.01(a)(5) or 42.03 of this code: (1) that in circumstances in which this section requires an order no order was given; (2) that an order, if given, was manifestly unreasonable in scope; or (3) that an order, if given, was promptly obeyed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reed v. State“(a) A person commits an offense if, without legal privilege or authority, he intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly: (1) obstructs a highway, street, sidewalk, railway, waterway, elevator, aisle, hallway, entrance, or exit to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access, or any other place used for the passage of persons, vehicles, or conveyances, regardless of the means of creating the obstruction and whether the obstruction arises from his acts alone or from his acts and the acts of others; ****** (b) For purposes of this section, “obstruct” means to render impassable or to render passage unreasonably inconvenient or hazardous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brightbill v. State“The State has the right to regulate the use of city streets and other facilities to assure the safety and convenience of people in their use. Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 , 85 S.Ct. 453 , 13 L.Ed.2d 471 . We find that Sec. 42.03, supra protects the right of the public to the reasonably convenient use of sidewalks and other passageways without an encroachment upon the First Amendment rights of the individual. Sherman v. State, supra [ 626 S.W.2d 520 (Tex.Cr.App.1981.] We find Sec. 42.03, supra to not be violative of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.