Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 635 A2D 1207 - In Re DB

In Re DB’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
3
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Bornemann v. Bornemann (1998), Bennett v. Automobile Insurance (1994)

66 state decisions

440199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re JR · In re J.R. · In Re AF · In Re HA · In re H.A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “question is whether the improvement substantially conformed with the expectations at the time of the CHINS adjudication and with SRS's case plan.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a complete lack of movement toward reunification,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re DM

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.