Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 635 A2D 1309 - State v. Pettengill

State v. Pettengill’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2018

6 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kolender v. Lawson · Sproles v. Binford · State v. Barry · State v. Hills · State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the word contact is not a word of art but one of common usage and Page 4332-SSSS commonly understood.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “requirement of reasonable certainty does not preclude the use of ordinary terms to express ideas which find adequate interpretation in common usage and understanding. . . . The use of common experience as a glossary is necessary to meet the practical demands of legislation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.