Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 635 F.2d 1045 - Moe v. Dinkins

Moe v. Dinkins’s Empirical Analysis

635 F.2d 1045 · 1980

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
November 2014
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2014

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Wisconsin v. Constantineau · Zwickler v. Koota · England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners · Zablocki v. Redhail

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A clearly-worded law leaves even the most constitutionally-sensitive state court little room to maneuver its way to a saving construction. Remand under such circumstances serves no purpose of comity; it wastes the plaintiff's, the defendant’s, and the state court’s time, and causes unseemly delay in the federal court adjudication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.