Glenn v. Dallman’s Empirical Analysis
635 F.2d 1183 · 1980
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2015
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Mullaney v. Wilbur
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... the great improbability that such efforts would have resulted in locating the witness, and would have led to her production at trial neutralizes any intimation that a concept of reasonableness required their execution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tate v. Flenoy“while petitioner's counsel did not exercise her opportunity to fully cross examine the witness, she still had that opportunity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where the evidence falls within a firmly rooted hearsay exception,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tate v. Flenoy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.