Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 635 F.2d 757 - Robinson v. Wyrick

Robinson v. Wyrick’s Empirical Analysis

635 F.2d 757 · 1981

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Evitts v. Lucey (1985), Holloway v. United States (1992)

20 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

2701981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rodriquez v. United States · Cook v. United States · Morrow v. Parratt · Williams v. United States · Dillane v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Those whose right to appeal has been frustrated should be treated exactly like any other appellant; he should not be given an additional hurdle to clear just because the rights were violated at some earlier stage in the proceedings. Accordingly, we hold that the courts below erred in rejecting petitioner’s application for relief because of his failure to specify the points he would raise were his right to appeal reinstated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “where none of Robinson’s alleged errors were preserved for review, we have no difficulty concluding that Robinson was denied his right to a direct appeal of his conviction and that he was denied his constitutional right to effective counsel— just as much as if counsel had never filed a notice of appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.