Mack v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
635 F.2d 828 · 1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Kizas v. Webster (1983), Hoffman v. City of Warwick (1990)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 5596 · 5 U.S.C. § 7151
Relies on United States v. Testan · Shapiro v. Thompson · Bolling v. Sharpe · Brown v. General Services Administration · United States v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Plaintiff does not have a taking claim under the just compensation clause because the provisions of the Veterans Preference Act cited by plaintiff that establish applicant eligibility lists do not create an interest in property subject to being taken for public use.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“do not create an interest in property subject to being taken for public use”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kizas v. Webster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.