In re Grant’s Empirical Analysis
635 F.3d 1227 · 2011
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Hicks v. Miranda · Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · Cheney v. United States District Court for District of Columbia · Lashawn A. v. Barry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'should not strictly bind panels' of the court of appeals and are often not 'suitable for governing future cases' given that they neither reach the merits nor benefit from oral argument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the same issue presented in a later case in the same court should lead to the same result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.