Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 635 F.3d 331 - Johnson v. Manitowoc County

Johnson v. Manitowoc County’s Empirical Analysis

635 F.3d 331 · 2011

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Graham v. Connor · David Conn and Carol Najera,s v. Paul L. Gabbert · Dalia v. United States · Kelo v. City of New London · Bennis v. Michigan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “generally left to the discretion of the executing officers to determine the details of how best to proceed with the performance of a search authorized by warrant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The reasonableness requirement [of the Fourth Amendment] extends to the manner in which the search is conducted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.