Murkeldove v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
635 F.3d 784 · 2011
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 31 U.S.C. § 3727 · 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 4654
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Lamie v. United States Trustee · Pegram v. Herdrich · Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jean · Shalala v. Schaefer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An assignment may be made only after a claim is allowed, the amount of the claim is decided, and a warrant for payment of the claim has been issued. The assignment shall specify the warrant, must be made freely, and must be attested to by 2 witnesses. The 'person making the assignment shall acknowledge it before an official who may acknowledge a deed, and the official shall certify the assignment. The certificate shall state that the official completely explained the assignment when it was acknowledged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“on a contingency fee basis under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(A) ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.