Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

635 N.E.2d 153

In re Bates

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1994

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1994-05-16

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-05-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Quillen v. Quillen (1996), Spranger v. State (1995)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 58 state decisions

320199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER OF SUSPENSION PENDING ISSUANCE OF OPINION

¶2This case is before us on the Hearing Officer's report finding that, on December 3, 1990, the Supreme Court of California suspended Respondent from the practice of law in that state for three (8) years, only six (6) months of which were an actual suspension, with the remaining term being a supervised probation. After a hearing in this matter, the Hearing Officer recommended that this Court give full faith and credit to the order of the Supreme Court of California and suspend Respondent for six (6) months with automatic reinstatement upon proof of discharge from probation in the State of California. After the hearing officer submitted his "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation", the parties jointly submitted notice form the California Bar that Respondent successfully completed the period of probation in that state.

¶3This Court, being duly advised, now finds that, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(2)(b), Respondent's suspension by the Supreme Court of California is sufficient ground for suspension in this state and that the Hearing Officer's recommendation should be adopted.

¶4IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Respondent, David Smith Bates, is suspended from the practice of law in this state for a period of six (6) months, effective immediately. Having successfully completed his California probation, the Respondent shall be reinstated automatically at the expiration of the six (6) month period of suspension. An opinion setting out the misconduct and other particulars of this case will be published at a later date.

¶5The Clerk of this Court is ordered to forward copies of this Order in accordance with the provisions of Admis.Dis.R. 288)(d).

/s/Randall T. ShepardRandall T. Shepard Chief Justice of IndianaAll Justices concur.
/635/ne2d/153 · .json · Public domain