Crider v. Crider’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reed v. Reed · Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers · 159 Ind. App. 105 - Hunter v. Milhous · Westphal v. Heckman · Teegarden v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the exercise of sufficient control over the person, the validity of whose act is brought into question, to destroy his free agency and constrain him to do what he would not have done if such control had not been exercised.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where one seeks to show that the child is the dominant party, he must do so by showing the condition and situation of the parties, their treatment of each other, and other cireumstances from which such ultimate fact may be inferred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the current law in Indiana regarding conveyances from a parent to a child clearly requires this court to assume, at the outset, that the parent is the dominant party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.