Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 635 P2D 494 - Stonefield v. State

Stonefield v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1983
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Waters v. State · Donlun v. State · Speas v. State · Pascoe v. State · Darling v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e do not believe that the record justifies Stonefield receiving a sentence in excess of a total of five years. A sentence “ought not to exceed ten years except in unusual cases and normally should not exceed five years.” Stonefield’s current offenses basically involved an attempt to obtain drugs for his own use without any intent to sell. This would place him within the third category of offenses under the criteria set forth in Waters v. State, 483 P.2d 199, 201 (Alaska 1971).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.