Gregory v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ * * * (The Injunction) prohibits the appellants from using the private roadways even if invited by the homeowners in the subdivisions who have the right to allow guests, employees or other invitees on the roads. The order should only bar appellants from any unauthorized use, and we remand the case to the district court to allow that court to make an appropriate modification of the injunction to that end." (Emphasis added.) Gregory v. Sanders, supra, at 802.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sanders v. Gregory

2. ““Jurisdiction to preyent threatened disturbance of the peaceful use and enjoyment of real property is inherent in a court of equity, and injunction is a proper and ordinary remedy for the protection of owners in the enjoyment of their rights in real estate_” (Footnotes omitted.) 42 Am. Jur.2d Injunctions, § 71, p. 815 (1969).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Weiss v. Pedersen

3. ““IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ (Sanders) Petition for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction be, and is hereby, granted, and that the Defendants, (Gregorys) and each of them, are hereby perpetually enjoined from using or traveling across the aforesaid lands or private roadways in the North Fork Subdivisions * * *.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sanders v. Gregory