In Re Ek’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stills v. Johnson · 243 Ga. App. 720 - In Re SHP · 275 Ga. App. 630 - In Re Am · 234 Ga. App. 717 - In the Interest of A. C. · 273 Ga. App. 554 - In Re Mls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The first step requires a finding of parental misconduct or inability, which requires clear and convincing evidence that: (1) the child is deprived; (2) lack of proper parental care or control is the cause of the deprivation; (3) such cause of deprivation is likely to continue; and (4) the continued deprivation will cause or is likely to cause serious physical, mental, emotional, or moral harm to the child. If these four factors are satisfied, the court must then determine whether termination of parental rights is in the child's best interest, considering the child's physical, mental, emotional, and moral condition and needs, including the need for a secure and stable home.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he father's incarceration history throughout most of the child's life, his failure to provide for the support of the child, and his lack of interest in the child, all of which were evidence that he cannot be relied on to meet the child's special needs, sufficiently showed that the cause of the child's deprivation was likely to continue and would not be remedied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the parent's rights should have been terminated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.