Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

635 So. 2d 1143

In re Sabludowsky

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 7, 1994

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1994-04-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2000

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-04-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM *

¶1The findings by the Disciplinary Board reveal that the Respondent, Meyer Sablu-dowsky, is guilty of two counts of commingling client funds. He also failed to pay his client’s medical bill in a timely manner. His conduct violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.5(c), 1.16, and 8.4(a) & (c) of The Rules of Professional Conduct.

¶2The Board noted several mitigating factors. The Respondent had practiced over 50 years without prior incident. He cooperated fully with the disciplinary proceedings, and has established a separate trust account. Several attorney letters were received by the Disciplinary Committee attesting to Respondent’s high ethical standards. Also, Mr. Sa-bludowsky was found to have no selfish or dishonest motive. Finally, both clients were satisfied with the resolution of their representation.

¶3An aggravating factor was Mr. Sabludow-sky’s failure to forward to the doctor his client’s medical fee in a timely manner.

¶4Upon review of the record of the Disciplinary Board’s findings and its recommendations, it is the decision of this Court that Mr. Meyer Sabludowsky be suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana for 90 days. It is further ordered that Mr. Sabludowsky pay all costs related to these proceedings.

¶5 Judge Charles A. Marvin, C.J., Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, sitting in place of Justice James L. Dennis.

/635/so2d/1143 · .json · Public domain