Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2019
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · 365 So. 2d 704 - Smith v. State · Baxter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“found that the officer had opportunity to view the defendant at the time of the crime, that his attention was focused on defendant, that his radio description, although fairly generic, was accurate under the circumstances, that he was sure of his identification, and, that a very short time had elapsed between the crime and the identification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alfonso v. State“The decision to admit a pre-trial identification is within the sound discretion of the trial court and the decision should be overturned only upon a showing of abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alfonso v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.