635 So. 2d 522 - Thibodeaux v. Cajun Restaurant’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Arceneaux v. Domingue · Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. · Housley v. Cerise
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“precluding imposition of penalties and attorney fees, if the employer had sufficient factual and medical information upon which to base a decision to reduce or terminate benefits. Thibodeaux, 635 So.2d at 526 (citations omitted). However, the jurisprudence has also established that an employer can be arbitrary and capricious if he fails to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.