Kibodeaux v. Kibodeaux’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2003
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 525 So. 2d 532 - Sun Finance Co., Inc. v. Jackson · Thebner v. Xerox Corp. · Ourso v. Ourso · 610 So. 2d 1114 - Mitchell v. Mitchell · 558 So. 2d 802 - Landmark Land Co. v. Jemison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“LAW La.R.S. 13:4231 provides, in pertinent part: (2) If judgment is in favor of the defendant, all causes of action existing at the time of the final judgment arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the litigation are extinguished and the judgment bars a subsequent action on those causes of action. (3) A judgment in favor of either the plaintiff or the defendant is conclusive, in any subsequent action between them, with respect to any issue actually litigated and determined if its determination was essential to that judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it shall, except for good cause shown, award attorney's fees and costs to the prevailing party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a valid and final judgment is conclusive between the same parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.