Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 635 So. 2d 784 - State v. Langley

635 So. 2d 784 - State v. Langley’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Colorado v. Spring · United States v. Causey · Peer v. Griffeth · State v. Jackson · State v. Lecompte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Louisiana was investigating the defendant and the transfer had not been officially completed. Until the transfer of the defendant's parole supervision had been completed, Georgia retained the authority to execute the warrant. During this period, the defendant once again absconded from supervision, never informing anyone about his new residence, and exhibited his inability to conform to conditions of parole. The defendant's actions had frustrated the attempts by both Georgia and Louisiana authorities either to transfer parole supervision or to execute the parole violation warrant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.