Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 635 So. 2d 813 - Lanier v. State

635 So. 2d 813 - Lanier v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2018 · most notably Holly v. State (1996), 662 So. 2d 552 - Stewart v. State (1995)

2 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

250199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · North Carolina v. Pearce · West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette · United States v. Butler · United States v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) two or more contracting parties, (2) consideration, (3) an agreement that is sufficiently definite, (4) parties with legal capacity to make a contract, (5) mutual assent, and (6) no legal prohibition precluding contract formation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Both parties are placed back in the positions which they occupied prior to entering into the agreement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[e]nforcement of the contract would also yield a result beyond the power of this Court to produce.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.