635 So. 2d 894 - Harrison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
64 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 805 So. 2d 452 - Simmons v. State (2001), 684 So. 2d 643 - Davis v. State (1996)
64 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Illinois v. Allen · Ake v. Oklahoma · Addington v. Texas · O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his Court weighs on a case by case basis whether the denial of expert assistance for an accused is prejudicial to the assurance of a fair trial and will grant relief only where the accused demonstrates that the trial court's abuse of discretion is so egregious as to deny him due process and where his trial was thereby rendered fundamentally unfair.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[o]f course a defendant must come forth with concrete reasons, not unsubstantiated assertions that assistance would be beneficial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ellis v. State · King v. State“[f]ailure to strictly comply with Rule 4.06 is not necessarily fatal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.