Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

635 S.W.2d 374

Houston v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1982

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1982-06-08

Relies on State v. Houston

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-06-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2000

4 state decisions

30198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SNYDER, Judge.

¶1Movant appeals from a City of St. Louis Circuit Court judgment denying his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The motion sought to vacate movant’s conviction, after a jury trial, on two counts of robbery. The conviction was affirmed by this court on appeal. State v. Houston, 607 S.W.2d 183, 185 (Mo.App.1980).

¶2Movant contends on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to vacate. He claims his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to secure certain witnesses’ presence at trial and for failing to present a complete record on appeal.

¶3The findings of fact of the trial court were not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

¶4The judgment is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

REINHARD, P. J., and CRIST, J., concur.
/635/sw2d/374 · .json · Public domain