Irick v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
636 F.3d 289 · 2011
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2019
most recently cited
5 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3599
Relies on Harbison v. Bell · Ammex, Inc. v. United States · Rosales v. Quarterman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Harbison , the Supreme Court arrived at its holding only after noting that state law did not authorize the appointment of state public defenders for the purpose of pursuing state clemency proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Samayoa v. Davis“obligate the federal government to pay for counsel in state [clemency] proceeding where the state itself has assumed that obligation”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bowles v. Desantis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.