Firishchak v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
636 F.3d 305 · 2011
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 137 · 28 U.S.C. § 1407 · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1427 (§ 316 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1451 (§ 340 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Montana v. United States · Liteky et al United States · Edwards v. Balisok
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A non-randomly assigned judge, without more, simply does not make for a due process violation[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.