Bishop v. Hackel’s Empirical Analysis
636 F.3d 757 · 2011
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Farmer v. Brennan · Pearson v. Callahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where the trial court's determination that a fact is subject to reasonable dispute is blatantly and demonstrably false, a court of appeals may say so, even on interlocutory review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Romo v. Largen · Gant v. Hartman“plaintiff or Rueckert, and at no point explicitly disputed plaintiff's testimony that plaintiff warned him of the danger he felt. (Dkt. 59-4 at 15-16; 20.) Taking the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff, he made a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCracken v. Haas“does not recall which corrections officers he complained to, [ ] is unable to describe the corrections officers that he complained to, and [ ] does not remember when or how many times he complained”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCracken v. Haas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.