Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 636 N.W.2d 104 - Foster v. Ankrum

Foster v. Ankrum’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Weiss v. Bal · Kuta v. Newberg · Greenwood v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) an unforeseen combination of circumstances which calls for immediate action; (2) a perplexing contingency or complication of circumstances; (3) a sudden or unexpected occasion for action, exigency, pressing necessity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A driver of a vehicle who, through no fault of her own, is placed in a sudden emergency, is not chargeable with negligence if the driver exercises that degree of care which a reasonably careful person would have exercised under the same or similar circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.