Bartsch v. Bartsch’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2024
22 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Pennoyer v. Neff · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco · Williams v. State of North Carolina · Estin v. Estin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determine the civil status and capacities of all its inhabitants,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Our domestic-abuse statute evidences a special solicitude for potential abuse victims. It allows a petition to be filed without payment of costs, Iowa Code § 236.8 (7); forms are provided for pro se filing, Iowa Code § 236 .3A(2); and the county attorney may assist the plaintiff in all stages of the proceeding, Iowa Code § 236 .3B.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If a court may constitutionally make orders affecting marriage, custody, and parental rights without personal jurisdiction of a defendant, it certainly should be able to do what the court did here — enter an order protecting a resident Iowa family from abuse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fox v. Fox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.