Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 636 P2D 1117 - Leppek v. State

Leppek v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
18
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 93 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 31 Cal. 3d 362 - Lipson v. Superior Court (1982), 38 Cal. 3d 454 - Becker v. IRM Corp. (1985)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 93 state decisions — followed in 18 states

5201981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grabill v. State · Blakely v. State · Russell v. State · Cloman v. State · Harris v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘In reviewing the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal, we examine and accept as true the evidence of the prosecution together with all logical and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, [citations] leaving out entirely the evidence of the defendant in conflict therewith [citations]. “ ‘A motion for judgment of acquittal is to be granted only when the evidence is such that a reasonable juror must have a reasonable doubt as to the existence of any of the essential elements of the crime. Or, stated another way, if there is substantial evidence to sustain a conviction of the crime, the motion should not be granted. [Citations.] This standard applies whether the supporting evidence is direct or circumstantial. [Citations.]’ ””
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.