Campbell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably McGregor v. State (1994), State v. Turrentine (1986)
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Green v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The purpose of the competency trial is to determine whether a defendant has 'sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding, and whether he has a rational, as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him.' Dusky v. Unmaited States, 862 U.S. 402 , 80 S.Ct. 788 , 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960)" (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The trial court should allow cross-examination into matters which tend to explain, contradict, or discredit any testimony given by a witness or which tests his accuracy, memory, veracity or credibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. State“matters affecting the credibility of the witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.