Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 636 P2D 470 - State v. Pilcher

State v. Pilcher’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2012

8 state decisions

401981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Daniels · Wilson v. Eureka City · State v. Magaha · 21 Utah 2d 431 - Trade Commission v. Skaggs Drug Centers, Inc. · 164 Pa. Super. 449 - Commonwealth v. Klick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... Appeals shall also lie from the final judgment of justices of the peace in civil and criminal cases to the District Courts on both questions of law and fact, with such limitations and restrictions as shall be provided by law; and the decision of the District Courts on such appeals shall be final except in cases involving the validity or constitutionality of a statute. [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the statutory language describes, as best as the subject matter permits, the test used to assess the driver's conduct. It is, therefore, no abridgement of appellant's constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] statute is not unconstitutionally vague if it is sufficiently explicit to inform the ordinary reader what conduct is prohibited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.