Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 636 SO2D 1112 - Jones v. Trailor

Jones v. Trailor’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2019

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

90199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · Canter v. Koehring Company · 623 So. 2d 1257 - Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. · Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. · 276 So. 2d 286 - Smolinski v. Taulli

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... in assessing the nature of the conduct of the parties, various factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including, (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct, (4) the capacities of the actor, whether superior or inferior, and (5) any extenuating circumstances which might require the actor to proceed in haste, without proper thought. And, of course, as evidenced by concepts such as last clear chance, the relationship between the fault/negligent conduct and the harm to the plaintiff are considerations in determining the relative fault of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Every employer shall furnish employment which shall be reasonably safe for the employees therein. They shall furnish and use safety devices and safeguards, shall adopt and use methods and processes reasonably adequate to render such employment and the place of employment safe in accordance with the accepted and approved practice in such or similar industry or places of employment considering the normal hazard of such employment, and shall do every other thing reasonably necessary to protect the life, health, safety and welfare of such employees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that her accident and injuries were caused by an unreasonable risk of harm created by the employer's failure to properly fulfill the duties imposed by the ... statute”); Vega v. S. Scrap Material Co., 517 F.2d 254 , 258-59 (5th Cir.1975) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.