Torres-Arboleda v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
67 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 768 So. 2d 1037 - Occhicone v. State (2000), Jones v. State (1998)
67 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Stafford v. Oklahoma · First National Bank v. United States · Carella v. California · Youngberg v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must have been unknown by the trial court, by the party, or by counsel at the time of trial, and it must appear that defendant or his counsel could not have known [of it] by the use of diligence.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Riechmann · Jones v. State“Proceedings under rule 3.850 are not to be used as a second appeal; nor is it appropriate to use a different argument to relitigate the same issue.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the newly discovered evidence must be of such nature that it would probably produce an acquittal on retrial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.