636 So. 2d 1342 - Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 660 So. 2d 1038 - State v. Hamilton (1995), United States v. Gomez-Guerra (2007)
6 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 354 So. 2d 362 - Carlile v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COM'N · Van Pelt v. Hilliard · 287 So. 2d 1 - State v. Egan · 421 So. 2d 510 - State v. Hicks · 65 So. 2d 12 - McDonald v. Roland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the curtilage is not a separate location wherein a burglary can occur. Rather, it is an integral part of the structure or dwelling that it surrounds. Entry onto the curtilage is, for the purposes of the burglary statute, entry into the structure or dwelling.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Where the legislature has used particular words to define a term, the courts do not have the authority to redefine it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he courts `are obliged to give effect to the language the Legislature has used.' Cobb v. Maldonado, 451 So.2d 482, 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). `Courts have then no power to set it aside or evade its operation. . . . If it has been passed improvidently the responsibility is with the Legislature and not with the courts.' Van Pelt [v. Hilliard], 75 Fla. [792] at 798, 78 So. [693] at 695. The proper remedy for a harsh law will not be found through construction or interpretation; it rests only in amendment or repeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.