Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 636 SO2D 1372 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2516 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3122 (§ 301 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)

Relies on United States v. Leon · Payless Wholesale Distributor, Inc. v. Albert Culver (P.R.) Inc. · Peretz v. United States · United States v. Meriwether · 113 So. 2d 394 - Hamelmann v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e also examine its interpretation by the federal courts under Florida's established rule of statutory construction `which recognizes that if a state law is patterned after a federal law on the same subject, the Florida law will be accorded the same construction as in the federal courts to the extent the construction is harmonious with the spirit of the Florida legislation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. O'Brien v. O'Brien
  2. “DOES INFORMATION TRANSMITTED TO A DISPLAY PAGER CONSTITUTE AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION AS DEFINED BY SECTION 934.02(12), FLORIDA STATUTES (1991), SUCH THAT TO LAWFULLY INTERCEPT SUCH INFORMATION THROUGH A DUPLICATE DISPLAY PAGER, THE STATE OF FLORIDA MUST FIRST SEEK AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 934.07 AND 934.09, FLORIDA STATUTES (1991)?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Jackson
  3. “any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photooptical system that affects intrastate, inter-state, or foreign commerce. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. O'Brien v. O'Brien

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.