Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

636 So. 2d 202

Wiggins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-05-13

Relies on Maddox v. State · 604 So. 2d 8 - Williams v. State

Decided 1994-05-13

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial *203court to reconcile and correct discrepancies between the written judgment and sentence, the order of revocation, and the oral pronouncements at the revocation hearing. See Maddox v. State, 619 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 604 So.2d 8 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

BOOTH, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
/636/so2d/202 · .json · Public domain