Ex Parte Valdez’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 997 So. 2d 1042 - Boise Cascade Corp. v. Jackson (2008), 825 So. 2d 838 - Hooker Construction, Inc. v. Walker (2001)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 575 So. 2d 91 - Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc. · 55 Ala. App. 701 - City of Tuscaloosa v. Howard · Pow v. Southern Const. Co. · Canterbury Electric Co. v. Price · 387 So. 2d 204 - Fordham v. Southern Phenix Textiles, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If there is legal evidence to support the trial court’s findings in a workmen’s compensation case, the reviewing court will consider issues regarding the trial court’s rulings on the admissability of evidence at trial only if the amount of illegal evidence which was admitted suggests the probability that the trial court’s findings were influenced thereby.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"A hazard can be a contributing cause if it is one of multiple factors acting in concert to bring about the occupational disease. . . . 'It is not necessary that the employment conditions be the sole cause, or dominant cause, so long as they are a contributing cause.' "”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`is required to make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the these findings should encompass each and every issue presented to and litigated in the trial court; where this is not done, the judgment should be reversed.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.