Steinhorst v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2018
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Steinhorst v. State · Scull v. State · 477 So. 2d 537 - Steinhorst v. Wainwright · 498 So. 2d 414 - Steinhorst v. State · Steinhorst v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“proceedings involving criminal charges ... must both be and appear to be fundamentally fair.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he court below should have treated this as a 3.850 motion, which would not be barred as untimely or successive if 'facts on which the claim is predicated were unknown to the movant or the movant's attorney and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[B]y its own terms, Rule 1.540 applies only to civil causes, not to collateral claims associated with a criminal conviction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. State · Bryant v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.