636 So. 2d 697 - Teat v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2013
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Hudson v. Palmer · Sanders v. United States · Price v. Johnston · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[A] denial of habeas corpus is not res judicata. The principle of res judicata is inapplicable in habeas corpus petitions.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““As the United States Supreme Court stated in Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 , 99 S.Ct. 1861 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979): “ ‘ “Lawful incarceration brings about the necessary withdrawal or limitation of many privileges and rights, a retraction justified by the considerations underlying our penal system.” Price v. Johnston, 334 U.S. 266, 285 , 68 S.Ct. 1049, 1060 , 92 L.Ed. 1356 (1948) ... The fact of confinement as well as the legitimate goals and policies of the penal institution limits these retained constitutional rights ... A detainee simply does not possess the full range of freedoms of an unincarcerated individual.’ “441 U.S. at 546, 99 S.Ct. at 1877-78 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.