State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Kniffin · State v. Comer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the person demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that the person has complied with the court-imposed deferment requirements, the court shall impose a sentencing alternative authorized for the. crime to which the person pled guilty and consented to in writing at the time sentencing was deferred ... unless the attorney for the State, prior to sentence imposition, moves the court to allow the person to withdraw the plea of guilty. Following the granting of the State’s motion, the attorney for the State shall dismiss the pending charging instrument with prejudice. If the court finds that the person has inexcusably failed to comply with the court-imposed deferment requirements, the court shall impose a sentencing alternative authorized for the crime to which the person pled guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.