United States v. Raub’s Empirical Analysis
637 F.2d 1205 · 1980
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2021 · most notably 567 So. 2d 1081 - Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries (1990), 135 S. Ct. 2443 - City of L. A. v. Patel (2015)
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Almeida-Sanchez v. United States · Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc. · United States v. Biswell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“One of the recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement is for administrative searches of enterprises that traditionally have been closely regulated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[c]ommercial fishing has a long history of being a closely regulated industry.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[B]usinessmen engaged in such federally licensed and regulated enterprises accept the burdens as well as the benefits of their trade, whereas the petitioner here was not engaged in any regulated or licensed business. The businessman in a regulated industry in effect consents to the restrictions placed upon him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.