Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 637 F.2d 1286 - Plasencia v. Sureck

Plasencia v. Sureck’s Empirical Analysis

637 F.2d 1286 · 1980

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 1983
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1361 (§ 291 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Infelice v. United States · Rosenberg v. Fleuti · Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding · Martin-Mendoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Maldonado-Sandoval v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the purpose of leaving the country is to accomplish some object which is itself contrary to some policy reflected in our immigration laws, it would appear that the interruption of residence thereby occurring would properly be regarded as meaningful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “who at any time shall have, knowingly and for gain, encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the issue in the case was simply whether, as a matter of law, the undisputed smuggling was or was not an 'entry' within the meaning of Flesh v. Rosenberg, 374 U.S. 449 (1963),”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. CONTRERAS

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.