National Labor Relations Board v. Anchorage Times Publishing Co.’s Empirical Analysis
637 F.2d 1359 · 1981
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. Carilli (1981), Aguayo National Labor Relations Board v. Tomco Carburetor Company (1988)
43 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co. · Magna Oil Corp. v. Bateson · Local Lodge No 1424 v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The pendency of a union representation election does not prevent management from carrying on its business in the normal fashion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“where an employer's conduct during an election campaign is so disruptive as to taint any 're-run' election.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The motive of the employer is critical in determining whether the granting of a wage increase prior to an election is an unfair labor practice. An important indicator of that motive is whether there has been a change from the status quo. [Citation.] Moreover, the law is well established that there is a presumption of illegal motive adhering to wage increases granted prior to an election. [Citations.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.