Ali v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
637 F.3d 1025 · 2011
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Shobna Chandar Lata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Zehatye v. Gonzales · Prasad v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Najmabadi v. Holder · Molina-Estrada v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence of changed country conditions tending to rebut the presumption of a well-founded fear of persecution, the IJ must make an 'individualized determination' of how the changed circumstances affect the alien's specific situation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Parada v. Sessions“Where past persecution has been established, generalized information from a State Department report on country conditions is not sufficient to rebut the presumption of future persecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Parada v. Sessions“) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.