637 F. Supp. 657 - Aquin v. Bendix Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1022 (§ 102 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1024 (§ 104 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (§ 404 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. · Reading Co. v. Schweitzer · Smith v. Hudson · Gordon v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a reduction in personnel, declining business, discontinuance of operations or location closings,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Douglas · Douglas v. Bendix Corp.“to minimize hardship caused by lack of employment with Bendix or a successor employer.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Douglas · Douglas v. Bendix Corp.“a separation initiated by, and voluntary on the part of the employee,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Douglas · Douglas v. Bendix Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.